Archive for the ‘Business’ Category

Transitioning

Monday, September 1st, 2008

Let me tell you…one thing I’ve learned is that there is never a ‘bad’ economy, the money is just shifting hands. You need to position yourself to be in the flow of money between point A and point B (or better yet, be point ‘B’). People are dumping a ton of money into on-line advertising and marketing as a cheaper yet effective alternative to traditional advertising and marketing methods.

In my last post, I re-emerged with a side business designing sites and doing some on-line application programming with a few partners (no one from Astro…again for those that care…) .It is going great! Every month we are doubling our gross income, with almost no overhead. You can’t beat it.

We are also getting exposed to many new industries. I’ve been in manufacturing for over 11 years. Now, we are diving into lending, health and beauty, oil, jewelry…even cookies. I couldn’t pay for this kind of education so quickly.

Anyway, to see some of our progress go to…

http://www.mcw-inc.com or http://www.marketbeauty.net

Wade Stankich

Web Design…

Saturday, July 19th, 2008

I know it’s been a while since I’ve posted. I’ve been up to some new things and it’s been crazy. Any, I’m back.

Here’s somethings that I’ve been working on with a few other associates (not anyone from Astro, for those who care). We dived into a bit of web site design. Mostly for the beauty industy, but we’v got a few things in the works for jewelry and cookies. I know this is a far cry from manufacutring, but it’s a skill that can be applied to any industry, and I won’t get slamed for ‘competative advantage’ issues. Someday I’ll explain…

 Check some of these sites out in the mean time….

www.stylingone.net

www.hairtique.com

www.cdrmiami.com

www.legalhair.net

 These are a few sites we’ve done recently…leave feedback one them if you wish. All constructive criticism accepted.

Thanks,

Wade

If you don’t want to be an I.T. professional…be a geek.

Friday, December 14th, 2007

I can’t count how may times I walked into Best Buy and seen that orange and black sign, and said to my self…”I will never hire one of these people”, or thought that if any of these employees really wanted to be an I.T. professional, that rose higher than their cubical, how crippled they might be with the label of “geek”.

Taking the stereotypical definition of “geek” and applying it to the “Geek Squad” or any other self proclaimed “geek”…a CEO would have to ask himself “Do I want this person responsible for melding my I.T. infrastructure with my business and interacting with my customers…or do I want a professional that knows technology?”

I would pick the later, myself…

Technology in business is more than building a PC for you neighbour, or showing a friend the latest Windows hacks, or knowing what memory chips work with what motherboard. A person has to be able to mix the right technology with the business that helps the company and it’s employees be more profitable, agile, informed (without info overload), efficient, etc. I.T. professionals need to learn the art of listening and communicating with all types of different personalities. This is something that is lost in the stereotypical definition of “geek”. In fact it is just the opposite. If you are a person in the technology field and you have trouble communicating and relating to the public at large, have extraordinary high IQ, and can recite every IRQ and it’s associated default I/O port on an ASUS motherboard…your probably a stereotypical geek and not much use in the business realm…unless the CFO needs a new memory card for his Black Berry.

Fortunately, communicating, listening, leadership, business concepts and other skills can be learned. A person can be very interested in technology and speak English at the same time. If your reading this and you are getting offended, take another look at your role in your company…you may be acting like a geek. If you want to take it to the next level, start concentrating on those “Soft Skills”.

In our I.T. department it is a widely known rule…”Don’t be a geek!”…

Wade Stankich
Information Technology Manager
View Wade Stankich's Profile at Spoke

I.T. and MBO (Management By Objective)

Friday, December 7th, 2007

The MBO philosophy (by Peter Drucker) has been used in many other organizations and businesses other than I.T. organizations, and probably before I.T. did. I believe it is the most beneficial model of managing an I.T. department. MBO doesn’t micro-manage … it empowers and develops staff. Here’s the formal definition…

MBO – Management by objectives (MBO) is a systematic and organized approach that allows management to focus on achievable goals and to attain the best possible results from available resources. It aims to increase organizational performance by aligning goals and subordinate objectives throughout the organization. Ideally, employees get strong input to identify their objectives, time lines for completion, etc. MBO includes ongoing tracking and feedback in the process to reach objectives.

Using MBO in I.T.

I had always used the MBO model before I even knew what it was. Basically, I’m not into micro-managing and I believe my staff should grow in their skills, knowledge and effectiveness. Additionally, I added to those attributes…’I need to work myself out of the job’. This thought requires a person to employ MBO, whether they know it or not.

The underpinnings of MBO is your subordinates. Much of your time should be spent pouring into them and building them up. I’m not talking about just emotional needs, but more skills and strengths. Have concern and think through their career path. Be concerned for their future before your own. The pay-off is extraordinary. The main pay-off is ‘TRUST’.

When assigning projects, the main focus should be the result the project needs to achieve. Let the person you assign to the project have more liberty in the creativity of solving the problem. You can also point out the results each milestone of the project should achieve as well. This is how you can steer a project and still maintain creative liberty in solving the problems. The grade should be given based on the results. Hold them accountable for the results. This will eliminate the need for micro-management.

Micro-management is a waste of everyone’s time. It does not foster trust. It is stressful for both the manager and the subordinate. This is the main advantage of MBO…eliminating micro-management, fostering trust which leads to a quicker, more efficient, cohesive I.T. team.

Wade Stankich
Information Technology Manager
View Wade Stankich's Profile at Spoke

Information Technology is in the Manufacturing Business

Friday, November 30th, 2007

I.T. is a unique department within a manufacturing company. This department can assist in answering some of the most basic business questions from the top of an organization to the shop floor. In a company with adequate I.T. resources, I.T. should be able to assist in answering questions like…

What’s my capacity?

Are we profitable?

What are my customer needs?

What’s the cost?

What are my critical issues?

What are my yields?

What’s my production schedule?

How’s my shift producing?

Where’s my material?

The potential for relevant, accurate and timely answers to many business questions is often overlooked. The fact that I.T. has a global view of the entire company to answer these questions, should make I.T. an essential part of the business unit, as opposed to the necessary ’support only’ department of days past.

So how does I.T. assist their company in answering some of their most important questions?

Obviously, the more data the organization collects and is made available, the better. If you’re lucky enough to be in an organization that has production, accounting, and HR databases, it will be just a matter of good planning to ensure data entregrity and having the reporting skills and tools available. For the purposes of the following paragraphs, let’s assume we have these databases available to us.

Let’s start with “What’s my capacity?”. First, lets define capacity: the facility or power to produce, perform, or deploy. : capability <a plan to double the factory’s capacity>; also : maximum output <industries running at three-quarter capacity>.

Let’s also assume our production database is collecting statistics from the processes in the routing of a widget. This means I have data available to the organization such as, widgets produced, scrap produced, time taken to produce the widgets, people resources need to produce the widgets, machine resources needed to produce the widgets, how much material I consumed to produce the widgets, etc. After some time to collect history, a company should be able to use this kind of data to derive real capacities and capabilities that would be of use to Materials Management, Sales, Product Development, Operations, etc.

Also, how does I.T. assist in answering questions like “Are we profitable?” or “What’s the actual cost of the widget?” Let’s define profit and cost. Proifit: the excess of the selling price of goods over their cost; Cost:the outlay or expenditure (as of effort or sacrifice) made to achieve an object .

We can merge our production data, purchasing and inventory data, and human resources data in a fashion that with give the organization a view of the true costs of those widgets, thus giving us the ability, when merged with accounting data, to see our true profits. Maybe we even see that doing business with a particular customer is actually costing the organization money. We could see that producing a particular widget is more profitable, and that may influence how we diversify the different markets we are involved in pursuing.

With the right infrastructure in place, the data is available to answer all the above questions. Today, I.T.’s role should be to have the business understanding that brings it all together in a way that gives their company a competitive advantage and is relevant to their organization. I think there are many I.T. professionals that already recognize this and are ready to participate as a business professional in their company, if they aren’t already. It would stand to reason, as I.T. professionals have a very unique view of their company that is global in nature and scope. They see the business as a whole not departmently. This is what enables them to put the pieces together in a way that benefits the company as a whole.

Wade Stankich

Information Technology Manager

View Wade Stankich's Profile at Spoke